Клип Коментар

prili4a mi malko na joss stone, ama tq e po-hubava 0:-)

kakvo mi govorish ti to i vishe obrazovanie bakalavur nishto ne e ako pitash men, nqmash li magisturska stepen se edno ne si u4ila vishe!

kit :-D

такуф мач не се забравя и мога да ви кажа че повечето станакса фенове на манчестер след този мач!

:-D

kuf tos iztursak ve :-D :-D

:-|

xaxxxaaa :-D :-D ehe taq napravo me razbi ina4e uporita jenicata :D ama izgori kam 3 litra benzin samo za tva parkirvane :-D :-D

brao e super qko :P

lele :-D :-D

kusmet :-)

:-D

:-D

Bear Grylls e nai-golemiq! :-)

the directory totally unnecessary, but you’re also putting a temporary dent in your PC’s performance.

out that folder as some tech sites suggest. For one thing, XP will just re-create that data anyways; secondly, it trims the files anyways if there’s ever more than 128 of them so that it doesn’t needlessly consume space. So not only is deleting the

(exename)-(hash).pf file in the prefetch directory, and if so we load those pages. (If it doesn’t exist, we track what pages it loads, create that file, and pick a handful of them to save to it.) So, first off, it is a bad idea to periodically clean

XP systems have a Prefetch directory underneath the windows root directory, full of .pf files — these are lists of pages to load. The file names are generated from hashing the EXE to load — whenever you load the EXE, we hash, see if there’s a matchin

vzemete malko po4etete i stiga ste vqrvali kato slepi kone ! :-00

qka e kotkata ama puk 4ak 20 hilki da struva mnogo :-D